Search

Items tagged with: ChatControl


"This is disgusting" indeed but you really think only Grok/X does this? Open your eyes about AI. CSAM generation is mild compared to its poisonous power. Using it to spy every citizen is way worse: stop this #chatcontrol nonsense now.


Of course the pedos who want #chatcontrol for us but not for them would call it "childlike" and "spicy mode".

You are the most disgusting and malicious part of the EU, clean your own front lawn and maybe call it what it is - deepfake childporn. Don't walk around the truth.


@muzicofiel
Fuck #chatcontrol and people should stop using these deplorable things like twitter... Problem solved!

Stop infringing on people's privacy because you need more "protection"


this is one of the companies you want to monitor social media for childporn and grooming with #chatcontrol


That's curiously complicated wording, when you can just say "child sexual abuse material" (c.f. #ChatControl).

Please, folks: just leave X, and as you do so, use the powers the Commission has to raze it to the ground.

#X #Twitter #Grok


@blenderdumbass #chatControl was never about the children. It was always about control. At least they are publicly showing it to everyone to whom it hasn't been bloody obvious from the beginning.


In the face or recent #chatcontrol stuff ( with similar reasoning ) I feel slight tingling of unease. I don't like AI, I don't like X ( or any other proprietary platform ) and I don't like abuse. But the way this argument was put together feels a bit odd.



what about chat control? Or omnibus? You could at least be honest, and stop doing disgusting propaganda. #eupol #ChatControl


Would be nice if the EU commission acted like it. Meaning:
- ditching #chatcontrol for good, along with all other ways of mass surveillance, like (european versions of) #Palantir.
- actually enforcing fines against #BigTech instead of halting it like von der Leyen did with #Google
- not selling our data to usa by #omnibus
- list goes on



Except that isn’t! You are actively assisting big tech with this move.

Asking children and adults to identify themselves online isn't holding big tech companies responsible!

Verifying who everyone is with government ids is not a solution. It’s a massive data breach waiting to happen.

You are enabling much much more harm to children and everyone using the internet by pushing this narrative of verification.
#chatcontrol #idverification #privacy #eu


#chatcontrol #digitalomnibus and #ageverification directly conflict with the decentralized, privacy-respecting internet the fediverse represents. The fediverse thrives on:

Anonymous/pseudonymous participation
End-to-end encryption options
No centralized identity verification
User autonomy

You can't have both "your data, your control" and mandatory ID checks plus content scanning infrastructure.


Since the EC also wants "Big Tech" to scan all communications with AI and track users continuously under the supervision of kafkaesque bureaucracy, who will control this feed if #chatcontrol is approved?


Then it would be nice if you'll stop with #digitalomnibus , #ChatControl 2.0, ID verification and similar changes that exposes the identities of these free press journalists.


then start cleaning your own house, if I look at the World Press Freedom Index personally I think that anything under 90% in our EU is unacceptable and should be fixed immediately! Naturally if you want to silence press by #chatcontrol or forcing to publish sources.....


while I commiserate, it's hard to take this message seriously when you're selling us out to fascist slop merchants #DigitalOmnibus #ChatControl


@PascalDrabik Maybe client side scanning of EU citizens' devices, something that is being pushed HARD by many EU nation states so that the European TLAs will know what every citizen is reading will encourage people to start reading properly curated, written-and-edited dead-tree publications.

No-one can work out what I read, or which part of an article attracts my attention, or which ad I look at when I am reading a print newspaper in the privacy of my own home.

#chatcontrol


OK, let's play the silly game of “would you think of the children”: What threats/weaknesses were identified? What options of tackling those were considered? And who is lobbying for this?

COI disclaimer: I am a “young European who uses social media” and I feel like DSA is needed for sovereignity and market regulation, not for “the children”, I never noticed the EU doing much in terms of mental health support or cyberbullying and I actively oppose #ChatControl and age verification (the last two points), as the current ideas are directly clashing with right to privacy.

Also, a thing that could protect “the children” would be GDPR, if data minimisation was actually enforced and platforms wouldn't just take collecting everything as their legitimate interest. #EC is directly responsible for enfocing those, right?

Please, stop appealing to emotions to push stuff. That helps noone.


er how about NOT having age verification? this is from the same people who proposed #chatControl which had the same "think of the kids!" excuse, while the authors of the proposal are not affected at all.

and besides, this is just a step forward to mass surveillance.


From the EU statement "Social media platforms offer highly addictive designs – infinite scrolling that is feeding the addiction, short videos snap attention span, highly personalised content, targeted. "

So fix the bloody platforms that harm our children first.

Making adults compensate for a lack of regulation by the EU of the digital market place by forcing them to constantly ID themselves is addressing the wrong set of issues.

#digitalsovereignty #surveillance #chatcontrol

This website uses cookies to recognize revisiting and logged in users. You accept the usage of these cookies by continue browsing this website.